PREPARE-ENRICH DIARY
THE NEWSLETTER OF PREPARE-ENRICH AUSTRALIA
DECEMBER 2006
(The next Diary will be posted on the website in June 2007)
 
MAIN ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE 
 
  • FAREWELL AND WELCOME TO TRAINERS  
  • HOW IS PREPARE-ENRICH AUSTRALIA TRAVELLING? 
  • ARE COHABITING COUPLES AT RISK? 
  • HOW CAN WE REACH MORE COUPLES, ESPECIALLY THOSE AT RISK? 
  • MORE RISK FACTORS: EXPOSURE TO ABUSE AND WARINESS ABOUT MARRIAGE 
 
END-OF-YEAR HOLIDAY CLOSING 

Please note that the PREPARE-ENRICH Processing Centre will close on Friday 15th December 2006 and reopen on Wednesday 3rd January 2007. 

REMINDER - PROCESSING FEE IS $44 

In February 2006 we made the first increase in the base cost of processing since 1999.  The $35 processing charge was set in 1999 and the GST added to this in June 2000, taking the GST inclusive charge to $38.50. Between June 1999 and June 2005, our net costs have increased by almost 15% due to constant increases in the expenses associated largely with wages, printing and postage. Our intention is to maintain the new processing charge for a lengthy period of time (as we have done before). We always aimed to make the processing cost comparable to that of a modest meal for a couple – we feel sure that $44 (for a couple) is still well and truly within those limits. 

FAREWELL AND WELCOME TO TRAINERS 

ACT. Southern NSW 

It is with regret that we say farewell to our ACT/Southern NSW trainer Albert Hile.  Albert has been a Prepare-Enrich user since 1993 and has been the trainer in this region since 1999. Albert has combined his role as our trainer with his work as a counsellor and supervisor of counsellors in Canberra.  Thank you Albert for the many training days you have run in the last 7 years and we wish you well in your retirement – you deserve it! 

We welcome as the new trainer for the region Jennifer Strachan. 

Jennifer has been using PREPARE-ENRICH in her counselling practice for many years providing help in the areas of personal/relationship and marriage preparation and enrichment.  She is a trained counsellor/therapist and has over 20 years experience as a Clinical Counsellor/Therapist, Adult Educator, Chaplain, Pastoral Worker, Clinical Pastoral Counsellor and Mentor. 

Jennifer has qualifications in Christian counselling, Individual & Relationship Counselling and a Bible College Certificate from Morling College. 

Thank you Jennifer for joining the team.  You can contact Jennifer on email: strachan3@bigpond.com or mobile 0409 038 850. 

Northern NSW 

We farewell Stephanie Cooper as trainer in this region.  Stephanie took on this role earlier this year when our long-term trainer John Wheeler moved to Sydney.  Stephanie’s work commitments have altered and she is no longer able to run training days.  Thank you Stephanie for your work this year and we wish you well for your future. 

We have not appointed a trainer to this region but hope to do so early in 2007. 

Northern Territory 

We are delighted to welcome our new trainers Bruce & Julie Southwell who will be running training days in Darwin and Alice Springs. 

Bruce has been an Anglican Minister in NSW for many years and is now the minister at St. James, Sanderson.  He has been using the PREPARE-ENRICH tool for the past 20 years and will bring many years of experience to the training role. 

Julie is also a PREPARE-ENRICH user and relational counsellor. She has experience in running workshops in her role as coordinator for the counselling and parenting programmes of Resolve, the Counselling and Mediation division with Anglicare, NT. 

We are sure that this “dynamic duo” will provide a great training/information service for PREPARE in the region. 

Bruce and Julie can be contacted on email: kbjsouth@ihug.com.au and phone 8927 2788.  Two training days have been organised and the dates can be found in the section for training. 

 HOW IS PREPARE-ENRICH AUSTRALIA TRAVELLING? 

A number of Administrators have asked how the organization is going, given that fewer Australian couples are marrying and those that do are marrying later and are less likely to be married by a religious celebrant (this has always been the greater proportion of our administrators). 

The National figures for the last three financial years and for each of the inventories are provided below: 
 
Inventory  2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006
Prepare 4280 4049 3881
Prepare-CC 1761 2029  2316
Prepare-MC 910 889 881
Enrich 761 742 687
Mate 36 43 43 
ALL 7748  7752 7808 
 
These figures indicate that we are holding steady, but for increased growth we need to work harder on training new Administrators, especially as many of our original group of Administrators (from the late seventies and early eighties) are now retiring. 

We would appreciate it if you could draw the attention of potential Administrators to our website and the training day details on that site. 

Please let your colleagues know about PREPARE-ENRICH and tell them about our website (www.prepare-enrich.com.au). By clicking on the training link on the Administrators' homepage they can locate a workshop or find contact details for a Trainer in their area, and can read information about all the PREPARE materials and resources. 
 
For a current list of Training Days throughout Australia go to:  

ARE COHABITING COUPLES AT RISK? 

A USA Study: Cohabiting Couples Higher Risk for Divorce 

Authors: David H. Olson, Ph.D. (Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota and 
President of Life Innovations) and Peter J. Larson, Ph.D.  (Vice President of Life Innovations) 

Overview of Cohabitation Study: 

This national study compared 1,000 cohabiting couples who took PREPARE-CC (Cohabiting Couples) and 1,000 non-cohabiting couples who took PREPARE. The premarital couples were classified into one of four couple types (from most to least happy): Vitalized, Harmonious, Traditional and Conflicted (see Table below). 

There were significantly more non-cohabiting couples (57.2%) that were Vitalized compared to the cohabiting couples (45.7%). Our longitudinal studies have demonstrated that Vitalized couples are happier and have the lowest divorce rate (Fowers, Montel and Olson, 1996). 
 
 
Couple Type PREPARE Non-cohabiting couples PREPARE-CC Cohabiting couples
VITALIZED 572       57.2 % 457       45.7 %
HARMONIOUS 70           4.0 % 192       19.2 %
TRADITIONAL 286       28.6 % 187       18.7 %
CONFLICTED 72           7.2 % 164       16.4 %
Total 1,000  100.0 %  1,000  100.0 %
As expected, there were significantly more Traditional couples that were not cohabiting (28.6%) than were cohabiting (18.7%). Our longitudinal studies demonstrate that Traditional couples have only a 16% separation and divorce rate after 3 years, compared with a 25% for Harmonious and 53% for Conflicted couple types. 

There were significantly more Conflicted couples in cohabiting couples (16.4%) than the non-cohabiting couples (7.2%). Our previous longitudinal studies have demonstrated that only 17% of the Conflicted have a happy marriage 3 years after marriage. Further, over half (53 %) of the Conflicted couples are separated or divorced after three years. 

In summary, this study clearly demonstrates that cohabiting couples have a much higher risk of divorce than non-cohabiting couples. Cohabiting couples have a smaller percentage of the more successful couple types (Vitalized and Traditional) and a larger percentage in the most problematic couple type (Conflicted). 

Our Programs Can Help Cohabiting Couples Improve Their Success Rate: 

The good news is that cohabiting couples can improve their type of couple relationship and, thereby, increase their chances of a successful marriage. A study by Luke Knutson and David Olson (2003) on the impact of the PREPARE Program for premarital couples clearly demonstrated that couples can improve their couple type (move one to two types better) by taking the PREPARE Couple inventory and receiving 6-8 hours of feedback and premarital education. 

References: 

Knutson, L., & Olson, D.  (2003). PREPARE Outcome Study. Marriage & Family: A Christian Journal, 6, 529-546 

Fowers, B., Montal and Olson, D. (1996).    Predicting Marital Success based on Couple Types. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 22, 103-111 

Postscript: How does this compare to Australian data? 

Author: Alan E. Craddock, PhD., National Coordinator (Prepare-Enrich Australia) 

Direct comparisons with the USA data are not possible because the Australian PREPARE-CC data cannot readily be analyzed in the same way due to our method of processing the data and the different norms used for PREPARE processing in Australia. 

However, one kind of reasonable, but far from exact, comparison can be found in the sample of 500 Australian PREPARE couples in Alan Craddock’s study Origins: Family Experiences of Premarital Couples, 2005.  In general, the differences between cohabiting and non-cohabiting couples across the four Australian couple research types generated in that study were not significantly different after statistical analysis. 

The specific Australian type that most closely resembled the American conflicted type was the non-religious conflicted type.  In the Australian study, 19.5% of cohabiting couples were of this type compared to 12.3% of non-cohabiting couples. These figures are similar to the trend identified by Olson and Larson, but only occur for this couple type. 

Be careful though, the Australian-USA comparison is not exact, it is simply offered as an approximation. In particular, the Australian research typologies were derived directly from a cluster analysis of the specific sample data and reflect some cultural differences. Religious commitment seems to make much more of a difference in the Australian data when the types are derived directly from the sample data. 
 
HOW CAN WE REACH MORE COUPLES, ESPECIALLY THOSE AT RISK? 

An Australian study has recently been published that indicates that relationship education reaches only a minority of marrying couples. (Halford, W. Kim; O'Donnell, Charlotte; Lizzio, Alf; Wilson, Keithia L., Do Couples at High Risk of Relationship Problems Attend Premarriage Education? Journal of Family Psychology, 2006, 20, 160-163.) 

What is important is that couples with certain relationship risk factors are underrepresented among those attending premarriage programs.  These factors include non-religious and cohabiting couples. The authors comment that: “A number of strategies might enhance overall relationship education accessibility, and some strategies might be specifically addressed to attracting underrepresented high-risk couples.” 

The authors suggest a number of important strategies: 

  • “Marketing might challenge couple beliefs that are barriers to attendance. For example, in Australia many people who do not attend premarriage education associate that education with highly religious and conservative views about couple relationships …Ensuring that relationship education is relevant to less religious and cohabiting couples as well as marketing its relevance might enhance attendance” 
  • “Placing relationship education within a broader promotion of quality couple relationships might enhance reach.” 
  • “Diversifying the formats of relationship education might enhance reach. Most relationship education is offered in face-to-face group sessions, and some adults might prefer to access relationship education in other formats.” 
  •  “Providing couples with access to relationship education at a variety of points of relationship transition might attract couples that do not access premarriage education. Most couple relationship education targets the time when couples are marrying, but a number of other life events are associated with receptiveness to relationship education (e.g., the transition to parenthood, relocation, and major illness)”. 
They conclude: “There is an accumulating evidence base that relationship education can enhance marital outcomes…Making a real difference at the population level will require reaching more couples, particularly those at high risk of future problems.” 

This is why the PREPARE-CC, PREPARE-MC, MATE and ENRICH inventories are such important and useful complements to the basic PREPARE inventory. 
 

MORE RISK FACTORS: EXPOSURE TO ABUSE AND WARINESS ABOUT MARRIAGE 

The previous articles have pointed to factors potentially associated with at-risk couples.  Another risk factor is wariness and lack of confidence about marriage that stems from exposure to abuse and violence. A survey by the Australian Institute of Criminology (Indermaur, D. Young Australians and Domestic Violence, 2001) reported that close to one-quarter of a sample of 5,000 Australians aged between 12 and 20 had witnessed an incident of domestic violence against their mother/stepmother. 

Furthermore, one of our research projects involving 500 Australian participants in the PREPARE program indicated that 18.8% of men and 23.3% of women reported abuse occurring between their parents within their family of origin (Craddock, Alan E., Origins: Family Experiences of Premarital Couples, Sydney, Hillfort Resources, 2004). Experience of abuse might shape an image of marriage that is negative and pessimistic and this could lead to lack of confidence about experiencing success and satisfaction in marriage. This is a “wariness factor” for couples considering whether or not to marry. The effect could be even greater if the person was also a victim of parental abuse. 

The Australian PREPARE research has also shown that couples with experience of abuse in the family of origin are significantly less satisfied in their premarital relationships. When we also add in the impact of increasing levels of violence in the community we find a strong basis for “marital wariness” – fear of being hurt in an intimate relationship and heightened sensitivity to violence as one increasingly common way of dealing with threat and frustration. Being in an intimate relationship may be seen as also being especially vulnerable to violence. 

Hence, our marriage education programs need to become more sensitive to these issues. They need to provide better opportunities for couples wary and damaged by experiences of abuse to develop positive and more helpful beliefs, feelings and behaviours in relation to their own marriages. 
 
REFERRALS FOR CIVIL MARRIAGE CELEBRANTS 

Civil Marriage Celebrants are required to encourage couples to attend pre-marriage programmes.  Celebrants often contact the Prepare Office to obtain contact details for Prepare Administrators in their area. 

We are compiling a list of Prepare Administrators who would be willing to offer the Prepare programme to such couples. Thanks to those of you who have already responded to our request in the last Newsletter.

If you would like to have your name added to this list please email or phone the Prepare Office.  This list will not be published - it is for our office use only.  If we had a request from a civil celebrant in your area we would provide them with your contact details 
 
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

Extending and maintaining your skills : Knowledge and skills need to be maintained and there are two ways of helping this process.  The first is using the materials regularly and the second is becoming involved in some ongoing skills development work.  We are now offering some training opportunities for existing administrators to further develop their skills and knowledge. 

For a current list of Skills Development programs that are available go to:    

ARE YOU USING THE MONTHLY HINTS ON THE WEB? 

At the beginning of each month we place a brief (usually one page) article on our website focusing on a matter or theme that is likely to be helpful to PREPARE-ENRICH administrators.  Sometimes this is a brief summary of relevant research, sometimes a practical suggestion, and sometimes a way of thinking about couples' issues.  It is good to get into the habit of reading these monthly hints.  The current hint, and an archive of all the hints posted in previous months, can be accessed from the Administrators' main page. News item updates are also included. 
 
ORIGINS OF CONFLICTED COUPLES - AN AUSTRALIAN STUDY  

The experience of family of origin is an important area for investigation among couples taking PREPARE.  Dr Alan Craddock (National Coordinator of PREPARE-ENRICH Australia and Senior Lecturer in the School of Psychology, The University of Sydney) has recently completed a small booklet called Origins: Family Experiences of Premarital Couples. This booklet, written solely for PREPARE-ENRICH Administrators, is based on an analysis of 520 Australian couples who have taken PREPARE and has three main aims: 

1. To identify and explore the main differences between highly satisfied (vitalised) and more troubled (conflicted) premarital couples. 

2. To examine the differences in family background of vitalised versus conflicted premarital couples in the National sample.  Of major interest is any link between negative experiences within family of origin in the past (separateness, rigidity and exposure to abuse) and present difficulties in couple relationship. 

3. To explore the practical implications of these findings, particularly when working with conflicted premarital couples. General strategies for working with conflicted couples are also described. 

The cost is only $12 and this includes postage and GST. 
To order this booklet call (02) 9545 4566 or email us at info@prepare-enrich.com.au 
 
Editor: Dr. Alan Craddock, National Coordinator of Prepare-Enrich (Australia).